Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Footprint Standards

...

How to properly align 3D models

Footprints

  • Component Centers

    • Where they belongsbelong

    • Is it the same for everyone, or stored locally by user?

    • Define a width and length for crosshairs

  • Courtyards

    • Can silkscreen be outside the courtyard?

    • Set specific courtyard distance from component outline

    • Set specific widths for courtyard + component outline

    What to do if no 3D model?
  • How to import footprints from Ultralibrarian/snapEDA/etc.

  • Silkscreen/Top Overlay

    • General guidelines for silkscreen markings

    • Pin 1 dot - define radius, thickness, min distance from pads

  • Pads

    • Establish annular ring convention?

    • Should we include tolerance data?

  • How should we handle components which say they’re (for instance) 8-SOIC, but recommend a footprint that’s different from and not encompassed by the existing 8-SOIC footprint?

    Standard convention for numbering mechanical mounting pads? (M?)?

  • Proper procedure if you can’t find a good 3D model online

  • Guide on how to import footprints from Ultra Librarian/snapEDA/etc.

Symbol Standards

  • define standard convention for Mechanical pin designators (M? vs. MNT? or similar)

  • Component States

    • Proper procedure if you review a component then catch an issue

    • If “In production” part has a minor issue, do you bother tweaking it? And if so, do you return it to “in production” or just make it “Reviewed”

      Do

      ?

      • If this happens, and a new “reviewed” revision is created, do you have to roll back the previous revision to a draft?

    •  

    Random

    • CL10A475KP8NNNC has two different components associated?

    • ERJ-3GEY0R00V has two components associated
      • all prior approved revisions to drafts?

Component Parameters

  • Case/Package vs. Package parameters?